5.2. #LA24-000039, George Stickney & Mark Gronberg, 1480 Bracketts Point Road, Outlot A and Outlot B, Bracketts Point 2nd Addition, Preliminary Plat/Replat "Bracketts Point 3rd Addition" and Vacation (Staff: Melanie Curtis)

[5.2. #LA24-000039, George Stickney & Mark Gronberg, 1480 Bracketts Point Road, Outlot A and Outlot B, Bracketts Point 2nd Addition, Preliminary Plat/Replat "Bracketts Point 3rd Addition" and Vacation (Staff: Melanie Curtis)]

LA24-39.

GEORGE STICKNEY AND MARK GRONBERG, 1480 BRACKETTS POINT ROAD.

OUTLOT A AND OUTLOT B BRACKETS POINT SECOND EDITION.

THIS IS A PRELIMINARY PLAT/REPLAT.

MISS CURTIS, THANK YOU.

THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING APPROVAL OF A PLAT TO REARRANGE BOUNDARY LINES BETWEEN THREE EXISTING PROPERTIES.

TWO OUTLOTS AND A BUILDABLE LOT AT 1480 BRACKETTS POINT.

VACATION OF A PORTION OF THE EXISTING DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS IS ALSO PROPOSED AS PART OF THIS APPLICATION.

THE PURPOSE OF THE APPLICATION IS TO REORIENT BOUNDARY LINES OF THE OUTLOTS IN AN OBSOLETE CONFIGURATION AND REMOVE AN OUTDATED NEIGHBORHOOD AMENITY IN THE TENNIS COURT.

[00:05:07]

NO NEW LOTS ARE PROPOSED AS PART OF THIS APPLICATION.

THE COMMON BOUNDARY LINE BETWEEN 1480 BRACKETTS POINT ROAD SHOWN HERE WITH THE HOUSE OUTLOT A, WHICH IN ITS ENTIRETY IS THE TENNIS COURT AND THE STORMWATER POND, AND WILL BE DONE BY MOVING THE EXISTING COMMON BOUNDARY LINE OVER TO THE EDGE OF THE EXISTING DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT COVERING THE STORMWATER POND AREA. THIS AREA WILL REMAIN UNTOUCHED AND REMAIN COVERED BY THE EXISTING EASEMENTS.

THE BOUNDARY BETWEEN OUTLOT A AND OUTLOT B WILL ALSO BE MODIFIED SO THAT IT CORRECTLY ALIGNS WITH THE ROAD, AND THE EASEMENTS WILL BE APPROPRIATE FOR THE ROAD IN THE AREA OF THE ROAD, RATHER THAN JUST THE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY.

THE APPLICATION IS NOT FOR A SUBDIVISION.

THERE ARE NO NEW LOTS.

IT'S FORMALIZING THE BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT, REPLATING AND RECLASSIFYING THE TENNIS COURT PORTION OF OUTLOT A SO THAT IT CAN BE COMBINED INTO THE BUILDABLE LOT OF 1480 BRACKETTS POINT.

A SUBDIVISION EXCEPTION WAS RECORDED EARLIER THIS YEAR, MAKING THE NECESSARY CHANGES TO THE BOUNDARIES BETWEEN THE OUTLOTS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE POINT, 1450 BRACKETTS POINT ROAD.

AND THESE OUTLETS THAT ARE SHADED, THEY'RE SHADED OUT THAT HAS BEEN COMPLETED.

IN ADDITION TO MOVING THE OUTLOT A BOUNDARY LINE, THE REQUEST INCLUDES THE VACATION OF THE EXISTING PERIMETER DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS BETWEEN OUTLOT A AND 1480 BRACKETTS POINT ROAD, SHOWN IN YELLOW.

THE DEDICATION OF REPLACEMENT EASEMENTS IS NOT NECESSARY, AS THE REMAINDER OF OUTLOT A WILL CONTINUE TO BE ENCUMBERED BY THE EXISTING EASEMENTS.

THE CURRENT OWNERS OF THE THREE BRACKETTS POINT SECOND EDITION PROPERTIES WITH INTEREST IN THE OUTLOTS HAVE SIGNED THE APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTS TO MAKE THE CHANGE.

REGARDING PUBLIC COMMENT, WE DID RECEIVE AN INQUIRY ABOUT THE APPLICATION, BUT NO FORMAL COMMENTS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED AND NOTIFICATION OF THE VACATION WAS SENT TO THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES.

NO FORMAL COMMENTS HAVE BEEN RECEIVED FROM UTILITY COMPANIES EITHER.

I DID SPEAK WITH MEDIACOM WHO INDICATED THAT THERE WERE NO IMPROVEMENTS IN THE AREAS OF THE VACATION.

STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAT, INCLUDING THE PROPOSED EASEMENT VACATION AS APPLIED.

I CAN ANSWER QUESTIONS AND THE APPLICANT IS HERE.

THAT'S ALL I HAVE.

ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? TO SUMMARIZE, THEY'RE MOVING THE BOUNDARY LINE MAKING LOT TWO LARGER OUTLOT A SMALLER.

TRUE. OKAY.

IF THE APPLICANT IS HERE AND WISH TO SPEAK, PLEASE APPROACH THE PODIUM.

STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.

I CAN'T HELP MYSELF.

[LAUGHTER] BUT MR. CHAIRMAN, MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND WONDERFUL STAFF.

GEORGE STICKNEY AT 540 INDIAN MOUND STREET.

I'VE OWNED A NUMBER OF HOUSES IN WAYZATA, BUT WE DID THIS LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT.

ALL PARTIES.

THE [INAUDIBLE] THEY OWNED FIVE OTHER LOTS ON BRACKETT'S POINT.

SO THIS WAS A JOINT APPROVAL FOR CLEANING EVERYTHING UP.

THE TENNIS COURT HAS NOT BEEN USED FOR 17 YEARS, FOR SURE, AND WELL BEYOND THAT.

AND IT'S IN DISREPAIR.

SO WE THOUGHT THAT THIS WOULD CLEAN THIS UP ONCE AND FOR ALL, AND THE TENNIS COURT WILL GO AWAY AND THE COUPLE WILL MAKE IT A REALLY NICE AND BEAUTIFUL SPOT ON THE HIGH GROUND AND PRESERVE WHAT'S THERE.

THE DRAINAGE, SACRED DRAINAGE EASEMENTS THAT ARE ON A COUPLE OTHER THE PROPERTIES.

I'M HERE FOR THE EASY QUESTIONS AND I HAVE MARK GRONBERG HERE.

I DON'T HAVE ANY. DIFFICULT ONES.

ANYTHING TO ADD, BUT IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS I CAN ANSWER.

THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANTS? SEEING NONE. OKAY.

I DO HAVE ONE QUESTION.

THE AREA THAT STAFF REFERRED TO AS A DELINEATED EASEMENT, THAT IS, A DRAINAGE EASEMENT, DRAINAGE AND UTILITY FOR THAT OUTLOT.

WHAT STORM POND. AND SHE MENTIONED MEDIACOM.

WHAT OTHER UTILITIES ARE THERE? THE ONE IN YELLOW.

YEAH, THE ONE IN YELLOW IS A STANDARD DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT THAT WAS ON BOTH SIDES OF THE COMMON LOT LINE BETWEEN OLD

[00:10:03]

OUTLOT A AND LOT TWO.

SINCE THEY'RE COMBINING THAT PROPERTY TOGETHER, THEY DON'T WANT AN EASEMENT GOING THROUGH THERE.

SO THAT'LL THEY'RE REQUESTING THAT THAT GOES AWAY.

IT'S A STANDARD EASEMENT ON PLATS FOR PERIMETER EASEMENTS TO PREPARE FOR THE NEED IN THE FUTURE FOR UTILITIES.

THE UTILITIES THAT ARE SERVING THE HOMES ON THE POINT ARE WITHIN THE ROAD.

SO THERE'S ACTUALLY THEN A VACATION OF THAT INVOLVED IN THIS APPLICATION.

TRUE. OKAY. YEP.

THAT'S ALL I REALLY NEEDED TO KNOW.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU.

THANKS. THANKS.

THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING. IF ANYONE FROM THE PUBLIC WISH TO SPEAK ON THIS APPLICATION, PLEASE APPROACH THE PODIUM.

STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.

I DO NOT SEE ANYONE.

I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

WE'LL BRING IT BACK UP HERE FOR DISCUSSION.

COMMISSIONER LIBBY, WOULD YOU LIKE TO START? I ASKED THAT I ASKED THE QUESTION ABOUT THE VACATION BECAUSE WE SO OFTEN IN PAST, I HAVE RUN INTO SITUATIONS WHERE HISTORICAL DRAINAGE NECESSITIES AND OR UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SOMETHING THAT WE DON'T NECESSARILY ALWAYS APPROVE SURRENDERING.

SO I THINK THEY CLARIFIED THAT THESE ARE REALLY NOT IN PERPETUITY FOR ANY ONGOING PRACTICAL USE.

IT SOUNDS LIKE UNLESS THE DRAINAGE IS GOING TO BE AFFECTED, BUT I'M SURE THAT IN THEIR APPLICATION THAT THERE IS ENGINEERING REVIEW BESIDES MR. GRONBERG'S REVIEW.

BUT THERE ISN'T. THERE IS NO ENGINEERING.

THERE'S NO CHANGE HAPPENING ON THE LAND.

OKAY. THE EXISTING DRAINAGE IS DIRECTED TO THE OUTLOT A STORM POND THAT IS EXISTING, AND IT WILL REMAIN.

OKAY. SO I THINK IF MY UNDERSTANDING IS CORRECT AND STAFF, YOU COULD MAYBE CHIME IN, BUT WHEN THIS WAS ORIGINALLY PLATTED, YOU WOULD DO AN EASEMENT ALONG EACH PROPERTY LINE.

EACH BOUNDARY TEN FOOT EASEMENT AND WHETHER IT GOT USED OR NOT, IT WAS JUST FOR THE UTILITIES AND OR THE DRAINAGE ALONG THERE.

BUT NOW, SINCE THAT BOUNDARY LINE IS MOVING, IT'S MOVING OVER AND THERE'S ACTUALLY A UTILITY EASEMENT THAT IT'S GOING TO THE NEW BOUNDARY LINE IS GOING TO BE ON TOP OF.

SO IT WOULDN'T NEED BOTH OF THEM WOULDN'T NEED BOTH.

A STANDARD ONE IS FOR DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PURPOSES.

BUT IT WAS THIS WOULD HAVE BEEN USED JUST FOR UTILITY PURPOSES AND ISN'T NEEDED NOW.

SO THE DRAINAGE GOES OVER THE TOP.

THERE'S NO DRAINAGE WAY THERE.

AND THE NEW PROPOSED LINE WILL HAVE AN EASEMENT UNDERNEATH IT AS WELL.

THE NEW PROPOSED WILL HAVE IT'LL WELL OUTLOT A HAS ONE ALL OVER IT.

SO THERE'S NO NEED FOR A.

YEAH THERE MIGHT OH THERE WILL BE ONE THOUGH ON THE NEW LOT LINE WHERE YOU HAVE YOUR RED LINE.

IT WOULD BE TO THE RIGHT OF THAT.

THERE WILL BE A STANDARD ONE THERE.

RIGHT. WE DON'T NEED ONE BUT WE DON'T.

WE USUALLY. WE PUT YOU ON THE PERIMETER SO YOU CAN DO THAT.

YEAH, WE'RE NOT REQUIRING IT, BUT YEAH, YOU CAN DO THAT.

SO IT'S REALLY NOT GOING AWAY.

IT'S JUST MOVING.

YEP. THANK YOU.

SO SO IS THE NATURE OF THE DRAINAGE A SWALE.

I MEAN, HOW DOES IT TOPOGRAPHICALLY.

HOW IS IT EXISTING NOW AND HOW WOULD IT BE IF THIS IS CHANGED AND GRANTED.

FROM THE CONTOURS EVERYTHING GOES FROM THE DRIVEWAY BY THE HOUSE, DOWN ACROSS THE TENNIS COURT TO THE POND.

THAT WON'T CHANGE AT ALL.

OKAY. SO THERE ISN'T A DRAINAGE WAY THERE.

IT'S JUST CROSS DRAINAGE ACROSS THAT AREA IN YELLOW.

OKAY. AND IN YOUR OPINION, THEN THERE'S NO AMPLIFIED RISK OF EROSION OR WASH OFF.

NO, NOTHING'S GOING TO CHANGE THERE.

NO. I MEAN, I RESPECT YOUR OPINION.

I'M JUST CLARIFYING IT.

SO THANKS.

OKAY. THAT'S ALL I HAVE.

THANK YOU. ANY OTHER COMMISSIONERS HAVE THOUGHTS ON THIS ONE? OVERALL, I'M IN SUPPORT OF IT.

IT SEEMS TO BE, FOR LACK OF BETTER TERMS, NEARLY AN ADMINISTRATIVE THING.

SEEMS LIKE THE ENTIRE NEIGHBORHOOD IS SUPPORTIVE OF THIS.

AND JUST TRYING TO CLEAN UP SOME BOUNDARY LINES AND AN OUTLOT A AND THINGS LIKE THAT.

I'M NOT TOO TERRIBLY CONCERNED ABOUT THE EASEMENT OF DRAINAGE, BECAUSE THE ALTERNATIVE IS THE ONLY WAY THEY COULD REALLY DRAIN WATER.

ALTERNATIVELY, WOULD BE TOWARDS THEIR OWN HOUSE IT WOULD SEEM, FOR THE MOST PART.

SO I'M REALLY NOT TOO CONCERNED ABOUT THE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT GOING AWAY OR POTENTIALLY BEING SHIFTED TO WHERE THE RED LINE IS.

EITHER ONE WOULD BE FINE WITH ME.

ANY OTHER THOUGHTS? JUST A LITTLE CURIOUS ABOUT IN THE REPORT UNDER ISSUES OF CONSIDERATION THE NUMBER THREE ISSUE WAS THE PLANNING COMMISSION SHOULD REVIEW THE CONSERVATION DESIGN REPORT AND OH, I'M SORRY, THAT'S

[00:15:07]

A TYPO.

YEAH. SEE THAT REPORT ANYWHERE? GOOD CATCH. THAT'S A TYPO, BOB.

I'M SORRY. SO FAIR TO SAY NUMBER THREE IS NOT SOMETHING WE SHOULD HAVE TO CONSIDER.

OKAY. WILL THAT BE TAKEN OUT OF THERE FOR THE COUNCIL THEN? I CAN'T AMEND THAT REPORT, BUT IT WON'T BE IN THE.

YEAH. ANY OTHER THOUGHTS BY THE COMMISSIONERS ON THIS ONE? NO FURTHER COMMENT FROM ME.

YEAH. IT LOOKS LIKE A PRETTY STRAIGHTFORWARD BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT.

AND CLEANING UP THAT THE STREET OUTLOT IS NICE AT THE SAME TIME.

I'M IN FAVOR.

IF ANYONE WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION, I WOULD MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE LA2439 1840 BRACKETTS POINT AS APPLIED, 1480 BRACKETTS POINT AND I WOULD SECOND IT IF THAT'S CORRECT.

OKAY. I'VE GOT A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LIBBY, A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER KIRCHNER.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION.

HEARING NONE, WE'LL VOTE.

ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE.

AYE. ANY OPPOSED? HEARING NONE. MOTION CARRIES.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR.

THAT'S IT FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS.

THAT BRINGS US TO OTHER ITEMS.

[6. Other Items]

YEAH. GOOD EVENING, COMMISSIONERS.

I JUST HAVE AN UPDATE.

AT OUR LAST COUNCIL MEETING, THERE WAS A HANDFUL OF APPLICATIONS THAT WENT MOSTLY ON CONSENT.

THOSE INCLUDED SOME.

I THINK THERE WAS A NEW HOUSE AND THE STORM WATER MOVING ON FOX STREET.

WAS ALL APPROVED.

THE ONE I WANTED TO HIGHLIGHT WAS 3245 WAYZATA BAY, WHICH WAS THE GRADING PERMIT.

DOWN ON WAYZATA BOULEVARD, I'M SORRY, 3245 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, WHICH WAS THE GRADING PROJECT WHERE THEY WERE THE CONTAMINATED SOIL AND THEY WERE MOVING IT INTO A MOUND. YOU GUYS HAD SPECIFICALLY MADE DISCUSSION AND COMMENTS ABOUT REGULATING THE SIZE OF THAT MOUND.

I HAD A FOLLOW UP CONVERSATION WITH MPCA, WHO NOTED THAT THEY WOULD REGULATE THE SLOPE OF THAT BERM TO A 25% MAXIMUM, WHICH IS WHAT THEY WERE ESSENTIALLY DEPICTING IN THEIR PLAN SET.

SO I MADE THAT THE CONDITION IN FRONT OF COUNCIL BECAUSE THE MOUND THEN COULDN'T BE ANY TALLER BECAUSE THEY WERE AT THEIR MAXIMUM SLOPE FOR THE MOUND BOOKENDED BY THE WETLANDS.

SO THAT IN TURN WAS REGULATING THE SIZE OF THAT BIG BERM.

SO THAT DID GO FORWARD WITH APPROVAL FROM THE COUNCIL.

AND THEY DID REITERATE TO THE APPLICANT THAT THAT ANY FUTURE DEVELOPMENT WOULD NEED SEPARATE APPLICATIONS AND REVIEW, BUT NOTED THAT FOR GRADING PURPOSES, THEY WERE IN SUPPORT OF THE APPLICATION.

OTHER THINGS THAT THE COUNCIL DISCUSSED WAS ONE OF THEIR WORK SESSIONS.

THEY DISCUSSED SOME NEW CANNABIS ORDINANCES WHERE WE WILL BE IMPLEMENTING SOME BUFFERING TO CANNABIS BUSINESSES.

SO THAT'S A TEXT AMENDMENT THAT WILL PROBABLY COME IN FRONT OF YOU HERE BEFORE THE END OF THE YEAR.

ALSO, WE ARE STILL OR THE COUNCIL IS STILL DISCUSSING CHANGES TO THE AVERAGE LAKESHORE SETBACK.

THEY'RE STILL REQUESTING IT TO GO BACK TO ANOTHER WORK SESSION.

SO THEY'RE STILL WORKING THROUGH POTENTIAL CHANGES IN SCOPE ON THAT.

BUT KNOW THAT A TEXT AMENDMENT MAY BE IN THE WORKS ON THAT IN THE FUTURE FOR AMENDING AND EASING UP THE AVERAGE LAKESHORE SETBACK REGULATION A LITTLE BIT.

LET'S SEE, I THINK OTHER UPDATES IS WE DO HAVE A STAFFING UPDATE.

WE WILL BE SAYING GOODBYE TO MISS NATALIE NYE.

SHE'S BEEN A GREAT ADDITION TO OUR TEAM, BUT SHE HAS.

THIS WILL BE HER LAST PLANNING COMMISSION.

SHE'S OFF TO BIGGER, GRANDER, FUNNER THINGS, I SUPPOSE.

BUT WE'LL MISS HER. AND WE WISH HER ALL THE BEST AND THE MOST LUCK.

AND IF YOU KNOW A GREAT PLANNER, LET ME KNOW.

VERY INTERESTED.

THAT'S IT. THAT'S ALL I HAVE.

THAT'S IT. OKAY. WELL, I'VE GOT TWO THINGS.

IF WE EASE UP AVERAGE LAKESHORE SETBACK.

WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSIONERS BECAUSE YOU DON'T NEED US ANYMORE MEETINGS WILL GET THAT MUCH EASIER.

WHAT'S DRIVING THAT? I'M CURIOUS.

IS THAT FROM THE CITIZENS OR.

I THINK THERE'S BEEN COMMENTS FROM THE CITIZENS.

THERE'S ALSO BEEN COMMENTS FROM STAFF JUST REVIEWING THE AMOUNT OF VARIANCE APPLICATIONS WE HAVE.

I THINK LAST YEAR HALF OF OUR VARIANCE APPLICATIONS HAD AN AVERAGE LAKESHORE SETBACK COMPONENT TO IT.

SO IT WAS LIKE 48% OF OUR APPLICATIONS, WHICH JUST SHOWS THAT MAYBE THE REGULATION ISN'T REALLY WORKING AND REALLY ISN'T BEING USED THE WAY IT NEEDS TO BE, WHICH TELLS US A CODE AMENDMENT IS PROBABLY IN ORDER TO WHAT THAT SCOPE IS AND WHAT THE NEW DEFINITION AND HOW WE SHOULD IMPLEMENT IT IS KIND OF WHAT THE COUNCIL IS DISCUSSING.

SO THEY'VE BEEN BOUNCING AND GOING THROUGH SOME DIFFERENT IDEAS.

I THINK THEY ARE DIRECTING A LONGER PUBLIC PROCESS IF WE DO MAKE ANY CHANGES OR IF THEY DO WANT TO PURSUE ANY CHANGES.

[00:20:02]

AND I'M THINKING WE WOULD PROBABLY DO A WORK SESSION WORKING THROUGH SOME OF THAT AS WELL, BEFORE ANY PUBLIC PROCESS WOULD BE STARTED.

SO YOU GUYS WOULD BE UP TO DATE ON WHAT THEY'RE DISCUSSING.

SO WE'LL SEE WHAT COMES TO FRUITION FROM THAT.

BUT YEAH THEY'RE LOOKING TO MAKE SOME CHANGES ON THAT ONE.

PERHAPS AN AI ALGORITHM.

MAYBE THEY'VE GONE THROUGH A FEW DIFFERENT OPTIONS.

THE ONE THEY'VE MOST RECENTLY TALKED ABOUT IS NOT.

AND I CAN TALK ABOUT MORE DETAIL ABOUT THEIR INTENT AND THEIR SCOPE, BUT MOSTLY ABOUT IF IT MEETS THE LAKE SETBACK, THEN THE AVERAGE LAKESHORES WOULDN'T APPLY, AND IT WOULD ONLY APPLY IF THEY NEED TO DO CONSTRUCTION WITHIN THE LAKE YARD TO MORE CREATE KIND OF A GUIDING BUILDING ENVELOPE.

THINK OF LIKE THE CRYSTAL BAY ROAD KIND OF SCENARIO, WHERE THE AVERAGE LAKESHORE SETBACK WE USE AS A GUIDING FOR THEIR BUILDING ENVELOPE ON THOSE REALLY NONCONFORMING LOTS, SOMETHING TO THAT EFFECT.

SO WE'LL SEE AFTER THEIR NEXT ROUND OF WORK SESSION DISCUSSIONS IF THEY GIVE US DIRECTION TO START DOING MORE OUTREACH ON THAT ONE.

CURIOUS, OF THE 48% OF THE VARIANCES THAT WERE APPLIED FOR, HOW MANY WERE APPROVED FOR THE ALS? I THINK MAJORITY.

MAJORITY? YES.

YEAH. I'M PRETTY CONFIDENTLY SAY MAJORITY.

I THINK MOST OF THEM, IF THEY WERE DENIED, THEY WERE BECAUSE THEY WERE BUNDLED WITH LIKE A LAKE YARD SETBACK THAT OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT, WHERE WE WEREN'T WE WEREN'T APPROVING OF THE OVERALL PROJECT.

THE MAJORITY WERE APPROVED.

GREAT. THANK YOU.

YES. MISS NYE, THANK YOU FOR YOUR WORK AS A PLANNER.

WE'LL MISS YOU.

THAT BRINGS US TO ADJOURNMENT ANYONE MOTION TO.

SO MOVED. OKAY. DO I HAVE A SECOND? SECOND. THIRD.

WE'LL GIVE IT TO MCCUTCHEON.

ALL IN FAVOR? AYE.

ANY OPPOSED? MEETING ADJOURNED.

THANK YOU.

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.

1. Call to Order

3. Approval of Agenda

4.1. Planning Commission Minutes of July 15, 2024

5.1. #LA24-000041, Ben Mayer, 2914 Casco Point Road, Variance (Staff: Natalie Nye)

5.2. #LA24-000039, George Stickney & Mark Gronberg, 1480 Bracketts Point Road, Outlot A and Outlot B, Bracketts Point 2nd Addition, Preliminary Plat/Replat "Bracketts Point 3rd Addition" and Vacation (Staff: Melanie Curtis)

6. Other Items

Aug 19, 2024 Planning Commission

1. Call to Order

3. Approval of Agenda

4.1. Planning Commission Minutes of July 15, 2024

5.1. #LA24-000041, Ben Mayer, 2914 Casco Point Road, Variance (Staff: Natalie Nye)

5.2. #LA24-000039, George Stickney & Mark Gronberg, 1480 Bracketts Point Road, Outlot A and Outlot B, Bracketts Point 2nd Addition, Preliminary Plat/Replat "Bracketts Point 3rd Addition" and Vacation (Staff: Melanie Curtis)

6. Other Items

Aug 19, 2024 Planning Commission

Link

Social

Embed

Download

Download Selected Item